天眼查
每体：弗里克此前与泰尔齐奇仅有1次交手，拜仁让二追四击败多特_我的网站
A |
The proposed Office of Management and Budget (OMB) rule, set to take effect in December, would mark one of the biggest overhauls of US science funding in decades, giving political appointees greater authority over grant awards previously guided by scientific peer review and requiring that they "advance the President's policy priorities," according to the Washington Post.
It would also effectively expand the 2011 Wolf Amendment, which bars scientists from using NASA funding for bilateral collaborations with China, to all federal agencies and scientists receiving federal funds, marking the largest break in US-China scientific engagement in decades, the US media outlet reported.
So far, the proposed rule has garnered nearly half a million public comments, many from scientists and leading US science bodies. A Washington Post analysis of 50,000 of those comments found that around 88 percent were negative.
The rule, initially set to take effect in October, was pushed back to December after a bipartisan stopgap funding bill temporarily halted its adoption. Unlike the Wolf Amendment, the rule does not require congressional approval to take effect.
"I do think there are still members of Congress who think we have a monopoly on knowledge. They think we're still in the Cold War Soviet era ... where we were ahead in most areas of science and technology. That is not the case with China. We are no longer the leader in many areas of science," said Tobin Smith, senior vice president for government relations and public policy at the Association for American Universities, which advocates on behalf of leading US research universities, per the Washington Post.
Scientists warn that the rule risks subjecting long-term scientific research to four-year political cycles. "We will not succeed if with every new administration we are ping-ponging back and forth about priorities," the American Association for the Advancement of Science said in a blistering comment, urging the administration to withdraw the rule. "Fast-tracking such profound changes ... hands an easy victory to nations like China," it said, the Washington Post reported.
This reflects a fundamental divide between the US government and the scientific community over how science should develop, Wang Yiwei, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that politicians tend to believe that suppressing China as a competitor would allow the US to preserve its market dominance and technological edge.
Scientists, however, tend to follow a different logic, as scientific progress depends on openness, exchanges and collaboration. If science and technology are driven solely by competition and private capital, with the ultimate goal of maintaining technological monopolies, this could create greater risks and ultimately undermine US interests as well, Wang said.
The proposed rule change is the latest salvo in a broader battle in Washington over how to respond to China's rise as a scientific superpower. In July, the US National Science Foundation (NSF) also moved to ban collaborations between scientist it funds and many Chinese research institutions and their employees, according to Science magazine.
Liu Shaoshan, director of the Center for Embodied AI at the Shenzhen Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Society and a former US-based researcher, told the Global Times in a previous interview that the NSF's new proposed rules created a "talent wall," arguing that restrictions based on nationality, institutional affiliation, and research partnerships could reduce the global talent pool available to the US, weaken its ability to attract leading scientists, and slow scientific innovation.
Liu also said scientific advancement relies not only on discovery but also on the exchange, validation, and dissemination of knowledge.
Wang also said China has built significant strengths through its vast pool of scientists and engineers, complete industrial chains and massive application scenarios, while increasingly moving from application-oriented innovation toward original research. Against this backdrop, US technological blockades and restrictions on cooperation are unlikely to halt China's progress, but could instead isolate American scientists from China's latest research and collaboration opportunities. Such an approach could also prevent the two countries from leveraging their respective strengths and ultimately undermine US competitiveness, Wang said.
。
B | 8月26日讯 西甲第1轮补赛，巴萨主场对阵毕巴，根据《每日体育报》报道，两队主帅弗里克和泰尔齐奇此前仅有过1次交手，弗里克带领拜仁击败泰尔齐奇执教的多特。每体表示，巴萨vs毕巴的比赛将是弗里克和泰尔齐奇执教生涯第2次碰面，两人此前分别执教拜仁和多特时曾有过一次对决，那场比赛以现任巴萨主帅的胜利告终。2021年3月的德甲第24轮，拜仁主场对阵多特，弗里克对决泰尔齐奇。多特方面，哈兰德、罗伊斯、胡梅尔斯首发，贝林厄姆替补登场，本场比赛，哈兰德开场10分钟双响。弗里克执教的球队向来以强烈的进攻欲望著称，他们从不轻言放弃。半场结束前，莱万双响扳平比分。下半场，拜仁持续猛攻，格雷茨卡和莱万最后时刻打入两球，拜仁最终4-2取胜。那个赛季，两位主帅最终都收获冠军头衔，弗里克率领拜仁轻松问鼎德甲联赛，而泰尔齐奇率队赢得德国杯冠军。在泰尔齐奇第二次执教多特期间（2022–2024年），他与弗里克并无交集，因为后者正担任德国队主教练。现如今，弗里克已在巴萨确立了英雄般的地位，而泰尔齐奇在经历两年赋闲期后刚刚成为毕巴主帅，不过他带队首秀1-3不敌塞维利亚。
Current article:http://wh0t.kuogahuaishaishei.buzz/news/20260826_561695.html
Published on:18:33:24
